A father loves his daughter to death, there is no pain for a parent largest of distress to know that a child can die: all or almost prefer their death to that of their offspring. How can a parent chooses to remove the last chance of life to her daughter? You can not judge must be desperate and his pain must be respected: the right to silence should be, if this option is not open to other hypotheses less happy. How much Eluana the national health system? How much are all other similar cases? Behind this controversy, all theoretical, political and throughout the entire ethics there are economic interests? In an era of cuts in public spending, with a world of sick and old increasingly numerous, this court fight has someone behind? There are those who want to save money "unnecessary"? Let me be clear, and private clinics may have interests to pursue therapeutic nell'accanimento not scordiamoci often behind these cases of the border will try new forms of care. This is correct, because life and quality of life must go on a "credible non-combat death. Why no mention of the interests that are pushing the different choices in favor of
biological testament or not?
Arduino Rossi
